Re: swig telecons?

On 2010-03-30, at 14:21, Dan Brickley wrote:
> I didn't write a position paper for the RDF Future W/shop (yet), but I
> think in a nutshell my opinion is: don't expect new standards to be
> the answer. This can be difficult for W3C since all the organization's
> momentum is around being a machine for generating standards. I think
> collecting wishlists and draft project plans around tooling would be a
> good next step...

I couldn't agree more.

As a representative of one of the startups that's pushing out code that's not sufficiently polished, we can't really spare that much manpower, but we help packaging efforts all we can.

We're very keen to help semantic web projects bootstrap, and get over the boring practical issues of running RDF-backed systems (backups, stability, predictability and so on), but at the end of the day that's not our core business.

- Steve

Steve Harris, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 18:23:53 UTC