- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 21:22:36 +0100
- To: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org, Damian Steer <d.steer@bristol.ac.uk>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote: > On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > >> so are we saying that all of these express the same: >> >> :me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string . >> >> :me foaf:name [ >> rdf:value 'nathan'^^xsd:string . >> ] . >> > I find it hard to communicate using a term that "has no meaning on its own" > (accoring to: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/#ch_value) > >> :me foaf:name :myname . >> :myname rdf:value 'nathan'^^xsd:string . >> > meaningless rdf:value again Anything stopping me creating an ex:value which does have a strong meaning and definition where in usage both of the following express the same: :me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string . :me foaf:name [ ex:value 'nathan'^^xsd:string ] . or does a property with this meaning exist (?) / any input on just how one would define this with rdfs/owl Best, Nathan
Received on Sunday, 6 June 2010 21:23:19 UTC