On Jul 29, 2010, at 19:59 , Mischa Tuffield wrote: > > Am guessing I should have just emailed the SPARQL WG people, but I thought I would also flag this matter with the RDF 2.0 folks. > Mischa, you did the right thing! The whole IRI/URI mess is on the radar screen for a possible new RDF work, and was also flagged as part of the Workshop output[1]. B.t.w., and as a minor remark: We do not know whether this will lead to a RDF 2.0. Maybe only RDF 1.1 or RDF 1.01. Let us try to avoid turning the RDF 2.0 as a widely used meme, for many people 2.0 means a radical overhaul which I do not believe would happen now:-). I, diplomatically, refer to it as RDF Next for the time being... Thanks! Cheers [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/index.php?title=RDF_Core_Work_Items#RDF.2FXML_and_RDF_Concepts_Errata > Cheers, > > Mischa > >> >> >> >> >> But then I realized that this uses a non-standard constructor for >> >> IRIs! I should raise this as a possible function for SPARQL 1.1. >> > >> > I just realized that this *is* valid SPARQL 1.1. The documentation for >> > IRI() isn't defined everywhere yet (it has its own section, but >> > doesn't yet appear in the tables). >> > >> > BTW, I'm not saying that this is the solution. (All those curly braces >> > give me the shivers). But it is *a* solution. :-) >> > >> > Regards, >> > Paul Gearon >> > >> > > ___________________________________ > Mischa Tuffield PhD > Email: mischa.tuffield@garlik.com > Homepage - http://mmt.me.uk/ > Garlik Limited, 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW > +44(0)845 645 2824 http://www.garlik.com/ > Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 > Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:19 UTC