Re: Draft on some weird KR ideas

Confused.
What is weird about this? Peirce is the father of KR and Ontology or, rather
of central to Pragmatist Philosophy and frequently quoted in the KR
literature. I don't know enough, but isn't this what already is? If not how
is it different?
If it is different you should push it further as you are surely describing
what *should* be meant by KR and RDF.
But, so far, it just seems like a strategy for setting up triples and their
treatment, nothing special.
What have I missed?
I really am very confused.

Adam

On 29 July 2010 08:01, SebXama <snsama@hotmail.es> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Anyone who has the time or is willing to read something rare, I'm
> trying to take a different approach to knowledge representation (KR). I
> don't
> know if it is new or even useful stuff neither
>
> https://xama.dev.java.net/files/documents/7100/151869/krdraft.pdf
>
> I'm trying to develop further those ideas to find useful applications
> (if there is one at all!)
>
> Regards,
> Sebastián Samaruga
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Draft-on-some-weird-KR-ideas-tp29293634p29293634.html
> Sent from the w3.org - semantic-web mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>