- From: Bob Ferris <zazi@elbklang.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 10:41:43 +0200
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Am 09.07.2010 20:02, schrieb Denny Vrandecic: > > On Jul 9, 2010, at 10:54, Graham Klyne wrote: > >> It has already been suggested that data: URIs provide a way to implement >> subjects-as-literals in RDF. I thought it might be worth fleshing this out a >> little to see where it leads... >> > > to linked open numbers? > > <http://km.aifb.kit.edu/projects/numbers/> > > j/k denny +1 Graham's proposal sounds quite similar to my proposed idea (taken from [1]): <quote> 3. I really don't understand the decision between datatypes and individuals (and their disjointness as Michael Schneider point it out; maybe it's a bit naive point of view, or that I haven't such deep knowledge about really understanding DL). What about handling (datatyped) literals as in-built individuals, e.g. a string typed literal would be then internally resolved to an ex:String individual. We could reuse the well-defined xsd datatypes etc. </quote> I know there is the concept of rdfs:Datatype, which causes maybe the trouble later in OWL (owl:ObjectProperty owl:disjointWith owl:DatatypeProperty). However, I think the OWL guys could fix that issue ;) Cheers, Bob [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Jul/0019.html
Received on Monday, 12 July 2010 08:42:18 UTC