- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:42:30 +0200
- To: Chris Sizemore <Chris.Sizemore@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
+cc: Ed Summers On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Sizemore <Chris.Sizemore@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a tweet > is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs are needed > to fully rep a tweet... > so, who's gonna volunteer to publish the linked data version of Twitter > data, a la db/wiki[pedia] ... Based on http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/04/how-tweet-it-is-library-acquires-entire-twitter-archive/ it looks like the Library of Congress might be taking on that job. And on the strength of the LCSH RDF work, it might even be feasible... Dan
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 09:43:04 UTC