Re: twitter's annotation and metadata

Dan Brickley wrote:
> +cc: Ed Summers
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Sizemore
> <Chris.Sizemore@bbc.co.uk> wrote:
>   
>> the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a tweet
>> is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs are needed
>> to fully rep a tweet...
>> so, who's gonna volunteer to publish the linked data version of Twitter
>> data, a la db/wiki[pedia] ...
>>     
>
> Based on http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/04/how-tweet-it-is-library-acquires-entire-twitter-archive/
> it looks like the Library of Congress might be taking on that job. And
> on the strength of the LCSH RDF work, it might even be feasible...
>
> Dan
>
>
>   
All,


Remember: http://semantictwitter.appspot.com/ ?

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen 

Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 12:47:50 UTC