- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:47:18 -0400
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: Chris Sizemore <Chris.Sizemore@bbc.co.uk>, adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, public-lod <public-lod@w3.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
Dan Brickley wrote: > +cc: Ed Summers > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Chris Sizemore > <Chris.Sizemore@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > >> the main problem is gonna be the cognitive dissonance over whether a tweet >> is an information or non-information resource and how many URIs are needed >> to fully rep a tweet... >> so, who's gonna volunteer to publish the linked data version of Twitter >> data, a la db/wiki[pedia] ... >> > > Based on http://blogs.loc.gov/loc/2010/04/how-tweet-it-is-library-acquires-entire-twitter-archive/ > it looks like the Library of Congress might be taking on that job. And > on the strength of the LCSH RDF work, it might even be feasible... > > Dan > > > All, Remember: http://semantictwitter.appspot.com/ ? -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 12:47:50 UTC