- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 00:06:21 +0100
- To: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com> wrote: > 2009/11/2 Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>: >> Hi >> >> Sandro Hawke wrote: >>>> >>>> 2009/11/1 Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>: >>>> > So, what should W3C standardize next in the area of RDF, if anything? >>>> >>>> Turtle syntax. > >> Turtle is out there and to my knowledge every important RDF library supports >> it - and OWL API does as well. I support having it as a recommendation - not >> only to give it the status it deserves but also to finally sort out the >> media type problems around Turtle and N3. :-) > > To really sort out the issues between Turtle and N3 it would be nice > to also push N3 through the process if it is developed properly at > this stage. Don't forget Turtle/N3 and SPARQL patterns, or N3 'and/or/vs' SPARQL Named Graphs... It'd be good to see the named graph concepts brought into the RDF/OWL mainstream, rather than left in the query language. So Pat Hayes' recent paper was encouraging there... Dan
Received on Sunday, 1 November 2009 23:06:57 UTC