- From: carmen <_@whats-your.name>
- Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 22:41:33 -0400
- To: 'SW-forum' <semantic-web@w3.org>
> advocates a common standard ontology is HTML not a standard ontology of document elements? personally i'd advocate gutting it to just <div>s. then you could get rid of the SGML/XML baggage/overhead/ugliness in the syntax entirely we'd prob ably be still figuring out agreeble ways to map sexps() to on-screem/mem DOMish trees, instead of have a usable web or justifying the validity of RDFa as a use case enable to various gods instead of dragging vcard's to our email apps.. > If any readers think that they have an ideal ontology in mind, I'd > like to ask one question: Do you believe that you have sufficient > hype and money to make your preference become the new mainstream? how would one create something like the web without a hype machine like the web to catapult it into instant ubiquity? > John Sowa > >
Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 02:46:55 UTC