- From: John Graybeal <graybeal@mbari.org>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 13:07:59 -0400
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Cc: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
What does it mean that the embedded link within the video vocabulary to 'media' (at http://purl.org/media#) fails? I eventually found something at purl.org/media/, maybe just a typo (ish). These look like pretty polished efforts... John On Jun 6, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > > Ben, DanBri, > > I'm as little shocked as others and send out a biiiiiig +1 :) > > Pls note, DanBri that you're in good company then. Additionally to > what > Ben's mentioned, there are other vocs out there that are already > defined in > RDFa, including the following: > > + http://purl.org/media/audio > + http://purl.org/media/video > + http://purl.org/NET/biol/ns > + http://purl.org/NET/scovo > > Cheers, > Michael > > -- > Dr. Michael Hausenblas > DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute > National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, > Galway, Ireland, Europe > Tel. +353 91 495730 > http://sw-app.org/about.html > http://webofdata.wordpress.com/ > > >> From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> >> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:28:40 -0700 >> To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> >> Cc: foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>, >> Semantic Web >> community <semantic-web@w3.org> >> Subject: Re: Parsing RDF from namespace documents - anyone reading >> RDF from >> inside XHTML? (foaf ns) >> Resent-From: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org> >> Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:29:30 +0000 >> >> Dan Brickley wrote: >>> Would any object if future versions of the FOAF spec didn't embed >>> RDF/XML in the XHTML? The RDF (ie. RDFS/OWL) will still be >>> accessible >>> via content negotiation and a link to index.rdf as above. In >>> addition we >>> can add some RDFa, covering some (and perhaps eventually all) of >>> the RDF >>> statements from the schema. Libby's begun working on the latter >>> piece. >> >> It will come as a shock to no one that I think this is a good idea :) >> >> In general, I like RDFS using RDFa, because it provides a nice >> human FYN >> story. We do this at CC: http://creativecommons.org/ns >> >> That's a human-readable spec, which is nice for folks who don't >> know the >> details of RDF up front. Yes I know it can be done via redirects, >> but I >> think this approach is a bit clearer. >> >> -Ben >> >> > > John -------------- John Graybeal <mailto:graybeal@mbari.org> -- 831-775-1956 Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org
Received on Sunday, 7 June 2009 17:09:14 UTC