W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > June 2009

parsing purl.org/media/video

From: John Graybeal <graybeal@mbari.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 13:07:59 -0400
Cc: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-Id: <04A3A28B-1E79-48E6-A0FB-CE4110B7D33D@mbari.org>
To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
What does it mean that the embedded link within the video vocabulary  
to 'media' (at http://purl.org/media#) fails?  I eventually found  
something at purl.org/media/, maybe just a typo (ish).

These look like pretty polished efforts...

John


On Jun 6, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:

>
> Ben, DanBri,
>
> I'm as little shocked as others and send out a biiiiiig +1 :)
>
> Pls note, DanBri that you're in good company then. Additionally to  
> what
> Ben's mentioned, there are other vocs out there that are already  
> defined in
> RDFa, including the following:
>
> + http://purl.org/media/audio
> + http://purl.org/media/video
> + http://purl.org/NET/biol/ns
> + http://purl.org/NET/scovo
>
> Cheers,
>      Michael
>
> -- 
> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
> Galway, Ireland, Europe
> Tel. +353 91 495730
> http://sw-app.org/about.html
> http://webofdata.wordpress.com/
>
>
>> From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
>> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:28:40 -0700
>> To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
>> Cc: foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>,  
>> Semantic Web
>> community <semantic-web@w3.org>
>> Subject: Re: Parsing RDF from namespace documents - anyone reading  
>> RDF from
>> inside  XHTML? (foaf ns)
>> Resent-From: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
>> Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:29:30 +0000
>>
>> Dan Brickley wrote:
>>> Would any object if future versions of the FOAF spec didn't embed
>>> RDF/XML in the XHTML? The RDF (ie. RDFS/OWL) will still be  
>>> accessible
>>> via content negotiation and a link to index.rdf as above. In  
>>> addition we
>>> can add some RDFa, covering some (and perhaps eventually all) of  
>>> the RDF
>>> statements from the schema. Libby's begun working on the latter  
>>> piece.
>>
>> It will come as a shock to no one that I think this is a good idea :)
>>
>> In general, I like RDFS using RDFa, because it provides a nice  
>> human FYN
>> story. We do this at CC: http://creativecommons.org/ns
>>
>> That's a human-readable spec, which is nice for folks who don't  
>> know the
>> details of RDF up front. Yes I know it can be done via redirects,  
>> but I
>> think this approach is a bit clearer.
>>
>> -Ben
>>
>>
>
>


John

--------------
John Graybeal   <mailto:graybeal@mbari.org>  -- 831-775-1956
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org
Received on Sunday, 7 June 2009 17:09:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:47:58 UTC