Re: Parsing RDF from namespace documents - anyone reading RDF from inside XHTML? (foaf ns)

Ben, DanBri,

I'm as little shocked as others and send out a biiiiiig +1 :)

Pls note, DanBri that you're in good company then. Additionally to what
Ben's mentioned, there are other vocs out there that are already defined in
RDFa, including the following:

+ http://purl.org/media/audio
+ http://purl.org/media/video
+ http://purl.org/NET/biol/ns
+ http://purl.org/NET/scovo

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/


> From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:28:40 -0700
> To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
> Cc: foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>, Semantic Web
> community <semantic-web@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: Parsing RDF from namespace documents - anyone reading RDF from
> inside  XHTML? (foaf ns)
> Resent-From: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:29:30 +0000
> 
> Dan Brickley wrote:
>> Would any object if future versions of the FOAF spec didn't embed
>> RDF/XML in the XHTML? The RDF (ie. RDFS/OWL) will still be accessible
>> via content negotiation and a link to index.rdf as above. In addition we
>> can add some RDFa, covering some (and perhaps eventually all) of the RDF
>> statements from the schema. Libby's begun working on the latter piece.
> 
> It will come as a shock to no one that I think this is a good idea :)
> 
> In general, I like RDFS using RDFa, because it provides a nice human FYN
> story. We do this at CC: http://creativecommons.org/ns
> 
> That's a human-readable spec, which is nice for folks who don't know the
> details of RDF up front. Yes I know it can be done via redirects, but I
> think this approach is a bit clearer.
> 
> -Ben
> 
>

Received on Saturday, 6 June 2009 08:49:05 UTC