- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:20:42 +0100
- To: John Graybeal <graybeal@mbari.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
John, > What does it mean that the embedded link within the video vocabulary > to 'media' (at http://purl.org/media#) fails? I eventually found > something at purl.org/media/, maybe just a typo (ish). That there is a problem somewhere. Thanks for pointing it out. Manu? Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, Galway, Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://sw-app.org/about.html http://webofdata.wordpress.com/ > From: John Graybeal <graybeal@mbari.org> > Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 13:07:59 -0400 > To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> > Cc: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Semantic Web > community <semantic-web@w3.org> > Subject: parsing purl.org/media/video > > What does it mean that the embedded link within the video vocabulary > to 'media' (at http://purl.org/media#) fails? I eventually found > something at purl.org/media/, maybe just a typo (ish). > > These look like pretty polished efforts... > > John > > > On Jun 6, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > >> >> Ben, DanBri, >> >> I'm as little shocked as others and send out a biiiiiig +1 :) >> >> Pls note, DanBri that you're in good company then. Additionally to >> what >> Ben's mentioned, there are other vocs out there that are already >> defined in >> RDFa, including the following: >> >> + http://purl.org/media/audio >> + http://purl.org/media/video >> + http://purl.org/NET/biol/ns >> + http://purl.org/NET/scovo >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan, >> Galway, Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> http://webofdata.wordpress.com/ >> >> >>> From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> >>> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:28:40 -0700 >>> To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> >>> Cc: foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>, >>> Semantic Web >>> community <semantic-web@w3.org> >>> Subject: Re: Parsing RDF from namespace documents - anyone reading >>> RDF from >>> inside XHTML? (foaf ns) >>> Resent-From: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org> >>> Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:29:30 +0000 >>> >>> Dan Brickley wrote: >>>> Would any object if future versions of the FOAF spec didn't embed >>>> RDF/XML in the XHTML? The RDF (ie. RDFS/OWL) will still be >>>> accessible >>>> via content negotiation and a link to index.rdf as above. In >>>> addition we >>>> can add some RDFa, covering some (and perhaps eventually all) of >>>> the RDF >>>> statements from the schema. Libby's begun working on the latter >>>> piece. >>> >>> It will come as a shock to no one that I think this is a good idea :) >>> >>> In general, I like RDFS using RDFa, because it provides a nice >>> human FYN >>> story. We do this at CC: http://creativecommons.org/ns >>> >>> That's a human-readable spec, which is nice for folks who don't >>> know the >>> details of RDF up front. Yes I know it can be done via redirects, >>> but I >>> think this approach is a bit clearer. >>> >>> -Ben >>> >>> >> >> > > > John > > -------------- > John Graybeal <mailto:graybeal@mbari.org> -- 831-775-1956 > Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute > Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org >
Received on Sunday, 7 June 2009 17:21:23 UTC