- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:20:42 +0100
- To: John Graybeal <graybeal@mbari.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
John,
> What does it mean that the embedded link within the video vocabulary
> to 'media' (at http://purl.org/media#) fails? I eventually found
> something at purl.org/media/, maybe just a typo (ish).
That there is a problem somewhere. Thanks for pointing it out. Manu?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/
> From: John Graybeal <graybeal@mbari.org>
> Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 13:07:59 -0400
> To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
> Cc: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Semantic Web
> community <semantic-web@w3.org>
> Subject: parsing purl.org/media/video
>
> What does it mean that the embedded link within the video vocabulary
> to 'media' (at http://purl.org/media#) fails? I eventually found
> something at purl.org/media/, maybe just a typo (ish).
>
> These look like pretty polished efforts...
>
> John
>
>
> On Jun 6, 2009, at 4:48 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>
>>
>> Ben, DanBri,
>>
>> I'm as little shocked as others and send out a biiiiiig +1 :)
>>
>> Pls note, DanBri that you're in good company then. Additionally to
>> what
>> Ben's mentioned, there are other vocs out there that are already
>> defined in
>> RDFa, including the following:
>>
>> + http://purl.org/media/audio
>> + http://purl.org/media/video
>> + http://purl.org/NET/biol/ns
>> + http://purl.org/NET/scovo
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas
>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
>> Galway, Ireland, Europe
>> Tel. +353 91 495730
>> http://sw-app.org/about.html
>> http://webofdata.wordpress.com/
>>
>>
>>> From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
>>> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:28:40 -0700
>>> To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
>>> Cc: foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>,
>>> Semantic Web
>>> community <semantic-web@w3.org>
>>> Subject: Re: Parsing RDF from namespace documents - anyone reading
>>> RDF from
>>> inside XHTML? (foaf ns)
>>> Resent-From: Semantic Web community <semantic-web@w3.org>
>>> Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 01:29:30 +0000
>>>
>>> Dan Brickley wrote:
>>>> Would any object if future versions of the FOAF spec didn't embed
>>>> RDF/XML in the XHTML? The RDF (ie. RDFS/OWL) will still be
>>>> accessible
>>>> via content negotiation and a link to index.rdf as above. In
>>>> addition we
>>>> can add some RDFa, covering some (and perhaps eventually all) of
>>>> the RDF
>>>> statements from the schema. Libby's begun working on the latter
>>>> piece.
>>>
>>> It will come as a shock to no one that I think this is a good idea :)
>>>
>>> In general, I like RDFS using RDFa, because it provides a nice
>>> human FYN
>>> story. We do this at CC: http://creativecommons.org/ns
>>>
>>> That's a human-readable spec, which is nice for folks who don't
>>> know the
>>> details of RDF up front. Yes I know it can be done via redirects,
>>> but I
>>> think this approach is a bit clearer.
>>>
>>> -Ben
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> John
>
> --------------
> John Graybeal <mailto:graybeal@mbari.org> -- 831-775-1956
> Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
> Marine Metadata Interoperability Project: http://marinemetadata.org
>
Received on Sunday, 7 June 2009 17:21:23 UTC