- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:28:40 -0700
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Dan Brickley wrote: > Would any object if future versions of the FOAF spec didn't embed > RDF/XML in the XHTML? The RDF (ie. RDFS/OWL) will still be accessible > via content negotiation and a link to index.rdf as above. In addition we > can add some RDFa, covering some (and perhaps eventually all) of the RDF > statements from the schema. Libby's begun working on the latter piece. It will come as a shock to no one that I think this is a good idea :) In general, I like RDFS using RDFa, because it provides a nice human FYN story. We do this at CC: http://creativecommons.org/ns That's a human-readable spec, which is nice for folks who don't know the details of RDF up front. Yes I know it can be done via redirects, but I think this approach is a bit clearer. -Ben
Received on Saturday, 6 June 2009 01:29:22 UTC