- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:02:32 +0200
- To: Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, foaf-dev Friend of a <foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org>, Peter Krantz <peter.krantz@gmail.com>, "foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org" <foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, "paola.dimaio@gmail.com" <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ian Davis <iand@internetalchemy.org> wrote: > Dan, > > Sorry to hear about the attack on your server. If there's anything I or > Talis can do to help, just let me know. > > On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > >> Thanks everyone for the concern and offers of help. It'll take a few >> days to figure out the best way to make the Web side of the project more >> helpable. In the meantime http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/ is worth >> some attention! >> > > With the lessening emphasis on RDF/XML, shouldn't we be looking at signing > the triples. I seem to recall a paper by Jeremy Carroll that discussed this. > Also, now many of us are focussed on bnode-free linked data the problems of > signing are much easier: serialise as ntriples, sort and sign the result. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2003/HPL-2003-142.pdf seeAlso http://blog.distributedmatter.net/post/2009/03/07/Signing-FOAF-files%3A-FOAF-files-as-certificates > > > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > foaf-dev mailing list > foaf-dev@lists.foaf-project.org > http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-dev >
Received on Monday, 27 April 2009 11:03:13 UTC