- From: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 15:12:06 +0200
- To: carmen r <_@whats-your.name>, semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3.org>
carmen r said the following on 2008-10-14 15:28: > On Tue Oct 14, 2008 at 12:39:54AM +0100, Giovanni Tummarello wrote: > >> Hi Martin, all, yes, it is a service that was planned, >> >> unfortunately the cache system we have is based on HBase, which is >> still in a very early stage and badly crashed on us recently. We're in >> the process of updating, restoring it etc. >> It will take some time but it is coming, will announce it when ready. >> (probably together with a simple library for transparent fallover) >> >> So a semantic web client could simply do an HTTP on the URL and if >> fails switch back to Sindice or whoever else wants to do that. >> >> I agree this service is badly needed. I dont think Semantic Web can be >> that interesting if a client doesnt mash or chains together several >> resources automatically, with the consequent dramatic chances of >> failure, thus the need for one or more backup servers.. (which however >> > > i think its fundamental enough a need to warrant architectural consideration > > i mean on the level of HTTP. > > not saying HTTP should go away. probably some bblfish way of doing it without inventing a new protocol (heck, Bittorrent still uses HTTP for parts) > > If purl comes back up we are lucky, but maybe we could learn something anyway. Having names for fundamental terms based on the DNS system is a weakness. What will we do if purl.org gets taken over by a casino site? Will we argue that the terms keep their meaning even if the casino site says something else? In my scifi post[1] I've scheduled this topic for 2015. Using hash-uri or other non-http uris have advantage of stability, but it's harder to look up the meaning, could we combine the approaches? should we have protocol independents terms with evolving meaning as in natural languages? > we need alternatives to the Google "we are your backup server" system > indeed. reto 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2008Jan/0118.html
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 13:42:06 UTC