- From: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:49:30 +0100
- To: "Reto Bachmann-Gmür" <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>
- Cc: "carmen r" <_@whats-your.name>, "semantic-web at W3C" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hey stop it there friend :-) this is basically like saying resolvable URIs are bad, unthinkable Giovanni > >> we need alternatives to the Google "we are your backup server" system >> > indeed. > same story all the time.. all seem to ignore this basic issue: if we are to do some sort of non trivial deduction we need multiple systems to be ON and working at the same time on the web this simply cannot be so something happens, an obvious solution is fall back (Transparently painlessly) to someone who has the love to actually provide a service for free and it would simply work. ... then the "hippie scientist" in all of us jumps up with crazy proposals about a new a nd different world where HTTP and google will be substituted by .. p2p, quantum entaglements or whatever.. then the discussion gets boring and back to point one "lets pretend the problem doesnt exist" the look will only stop when somebody actually begins making something useful with semantic web data, in which case they'll simply use the transparent fallback solution :-) am i growing too old ? Giovanni
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 18:50:05 UTC