- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:59:58 -0500
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: Cristiano Longo <cristiano.longo@tvblob.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > > It's OWL, but not OWL-DL. > I would very much like there to be an OWL-DL version too, or at least to > factor it into two components - an OWL-DL portion, and a set of further > axioms that are imported by OWL full users. I've wondered about how best to do this: are there any discovery conventions for finding an OWL DL flavour of a vocabulary which otherwise also has OWL Full variants at the namespace URI? Or vice-versa? Could eg. editors read HTML or RDF/XML from the namespace URI, poke around and find the URL to a pure DL subset? Dan -- http://danbri.org/
Received on Thursday, 12 June 2008 17:00:37 UTC