- From: Golda Velez <gv@btucson.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2008 07:43:18 -0700
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Hello again - I guess my question about subclassing vocabularies that I don't maintain was either too clueless or too complex - so, here is a simpler question. I'm working on an article for Linux Journal that will be titled something like 'Are We There Yet? Semantic Technologies for the Web Developer' (it was originally just about RDFa, but we've expanded the scope some). Say I want to express in RDF a statement like the following: --------------------- "The Az Sonora Desert Museum serves shade grown-coffee, which supports ecological diversity as per Win-Win Ecology by Mike Rosenzweig." --------------------- I can use wikipedia or other authoritative URIs for the entities and concepts like the Desert Museum, shade-grown coffee, ecological diversity, and the book. The question is which vocab's to use for the verbs - serves, supports, and 'as per' - and can I use reification or do I have to invent a tortured class that owns its own caveats? bagID would seem useful for this but its deprecated? Here's another statement, that definitely needs non-authoritative expression as its quite controversial: -------------------- "David O'Reilly, CEO of Chevron, hasResponsibilityFor the Burma military regime because of Chevron's involvement in the Yadana oil field" ------------------ How do I find the right vocabulary to express this statement? And for others to agree and disagree with it, what is the best way to give it its own URI or other identifier so other statements can be made about this statement? I think that in the mucky real world, making and responding to statements of this type of complexity would be useful. Should we just stick to English or our other native tongue? --Golda -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Golda Velez 520-440-1420 http://goldavelez.com what I do: Tucson Superblog http://btucson.com Search software http://webglimpse.net Web hosting http://iwhome.com "Help organize the world - index your own corner of the web!"
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2008 14:39:55 UTC