W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Triples storage

From: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:03:02 -0400
Message-Id: <A9B2D1CB-CC38-4BAB-A2E0-C0400DEE427A@w3.org>
Cc: Semantic Web Interest Group <semantic-web@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
To: Renato Golin <renato@ebi.ac.uk>

On 2007-09 -26, at 08:35, Renato Golin wrote:

>> No idea, but there are full implementations of SPARQL, and lots of
>> more-or-less complete ones.
> The specification of the language is stable, the results you get is  
> not.
> There was a discussion in this list a while ago about two storage
> engines (big ones) yielding completely different results for the  
> same query.

Support the standard!    The SPARQL query language is a
single spec formed where there were maybe tens of query languages.
Coming together on the standard is, of course, very important,
so that one can write a program once and switch storage technologies
underneath it.

If there are cases when engines give different results from the same  
query on the same graph, then talk to the working group about it.   
Get the crucial bits in as a test case.

Received on Friday, 28 September 2007 13:05:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:02 UTC