- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:07:52 +0200
- To: bnowack@semsol.com
- Cc: "Frank Manola" <fmanola@acm.org>, semantic-web@w3.org
> On 12.10.2007 11:40:14, Frank Manola wrote: How about communicating a little better > >guys? Fair request, I agree SWEO should have brought this up here sooner. I'm not sure SWEO's charter explicitly mentions any relationship with W3C marketing, but clearly it does have some interface role there. Coordination with this Interest Group is definitely on the list. For what it's worth, the SWEO mailing list archives and meeting minutes are public: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sweo-ig http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/Meetings (I'm pretty sure all the members of SWEO follow *this* list, it's still probably the best place to raise issues regarding education and outreach). The recent changes page (and feed) on the ESW Wiki is also a pretty good indicator of activity: http://esw.w3.org/topic/RecentChanges Personally I like the cube, and would far rather have this logo on my laptop than the manufacturer's. Not too keen on the buttons or text though, I'm afraid. The usage restrictions do currently seem inappropriate. But in defence of the W3C folks, they were under pressure from at least two groups to get *something* out, and it is easier to loosen restrictions than tighten them. As I understand the intention, and seems sensible to me, the cube is more of a blanket marker, a different role to the 'blue atoms' RDF icon, which still seems ideal for indicating RDF data availability. I reckon the FOAF logo is here to stay too :-) Cheers, Danny. -- http://dannyayers.com
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 17:08:07 UTC