- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@semsol.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:02:56 +0200
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
I'm sure the new logo was announced on W3C's SW blog the same day. I don't think W3C has a formal process for the creation of visual material, though. SWEO just tried to help by coordinating the different design initiatives that had already started in the technology groups. We have limited resources, decisions had to be made. It would be great to have more members join SWEO so that we could have more bandwidth for "inreach" communication, too, sure. I would have loved to do the whole thing as a competition-like public thing, similar to our community projects, but that was simply impossible resource-wise. Point taken, though. Benji -- Benjamin Nowack http://bnode.org/ On 12.10.2007 11:40:14, Frank Manola wrote: >Er, not exactly. This thread started with a post from a member of >this list reporting the discovery of a new Semantic Web logo that had >apparently been posted the day before. Rather than with a post from >SWEO to the list saying that there was a new logo, let alone >something like a "last call" announcement that the logo (and >accompanying usage rules) was nearing approval. I suspect some of >the "panic" is a reaction to SWEO's apparent definition of "outreach" >reflected in this procedure. How about communicating a little better >guys? > >--Frank > >
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 16:03:04 UTC