- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@semsol.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:11:29 +0200
- To: "~@p15192371.pureserver.info:'' γγγγ?γγ 1γγγ 3/4 γγ E3" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Jonathan, thanks for the hint. I didn't create the SVGs, and I personally wouldn't have the relevant skills to add the textual information, but I'm sure the Comm team is more than happy to replace the files if someone sends them properly annotated ones. Or is that a trivial task? I think it's great that they provide SVGs at all. Cheers, Benji On 11.10.2007 15:56:13, ~:'' γγγγ¨γγγγγΎγγγ€ wrote: >I've only had a chance to have a brief look at the new logo. > >Benji > >I like the SVG graphic But.... >It does have significant defects. > >the text-rendering is defined but there is no text. >in fact the file has literally not a single content identifier of any >sort. >unless the file is rendered it is literally impossible to tell what >it might be. >pace those that render in their minds... > >The Web Accessibility Initiative WCAG guidelines suggest this is not >good practice. > >I'd hope the SWEO and Comm teams might also include relevant semantic >information. > >regarding the exceptionally restrictive copyright restrictions it >might be relevant to review Lawrence Lessig on Dojinshi. > >apologies if this seems heavy handed, or I got the wrong end of the >stick >as I say in a rush.. > >regards > > >Jonathan Chetwynd >Accessibility Consultant on Media Literacy and the Internet > >Michael Schneider wrote: > > > http://www.w3.org/2007/10/sw-logos.html > >
Received on Friday, 12 October 2007 13:11:42 UTC