Re: Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language updated

Michael Schneider wrote:
> Of course, if there really was an 'rdf:sameAs' in RDF, one would than also
> have to think about supporting 'sameAs' in RDF-S, too, as a reasoning
> feature (not necessarily of course, I know). And this might have led to some
> difficulties. So 'sameAs' might really have been /intentionaly/ left out of
> RDF in favour of an analog OWL concept in the future. Any SemWeb historian
> here, who can explain this to me? 

It was intentional. RDFS reasoning is meant to be fairly easy; I think 
the datatype stuff somewhat obstructs that.

Jeremy