- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 11:01:03 +0100
- To: Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>
- CC: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, semantic-web@w3.org, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>, Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Michael Schneider wrote: > Of course, if there really was an 'rdf:sameAs' in RDF, one would than also > have to think about supporting 'sameAs' in RDF-S, too, as a reasoning > feature (not necessarily of course, I know). And this might have led to some > difficulties. So 'sameAs' might really have been /intentionaly/ left out of > RDF in favour of an analog OWL concept in the future. Any SemWeb historian > here, who can explain this to me? It was intentional. RDFS reasoning is meant to be fairly easy; I think the datatype stuff somewhat obstructs that. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 10:01:37 UTC