W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Turtle - Terse RDF Triple Language updated

From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:05:22 -0700
Message-ID: <4703A1A2.2000907@dajobe.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Cc: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>, Michael Schneider <schneid@fzi.de>, semantic-web@w3.org

Ivan Herman wrote:
> My 2 cents...
> Regardless of the advantages, issues and objections on this very
> proposal... I think we should be careful about priorities. In my view
> the goal should be to have an absolutely stable turtle language that is
> as closely compatible to the language used in SPARQL as possible (it
> cannot be 100%, because, for example, SPARQL uses PREFIX and turtle uses
> @prefix). Personally, I would prefer _not_ to start discussions about
> new language features for now, much as it can be an enjoyable technical
> discussion:-).
> Maybe we can do something like that in a next round, but the priorities
> should be elsewhere in my view.
> And thanks to Dave for starting this...
> Ivan
> Story Henry wrote:
>> What about =
>> That would be a nice addition. :-)
>> Especially as it allows one to group statements together like this:
>> :me foaf:knows [ = <http://eg.com/joe/>;
>>                  foaf:name "Joe Smith" ] .

Many of the major reasons I'd not want to do this have been mentioned
1) It's a specific vocabulary burnt in. 'a' should be the only one.
2) It is not in SPARQL's triple syntax.
3) I am trying to stabilise Turtle by not adding new syntax now.
4) It means two things; an abbreviation for owl:sameAs and naming
   a blank node.  If I understand it correctly. This seems bad.

plus my own:
5) It has been rarely requested, rare enough I wouldn't consider adding it.
6) Naming a blank node [ = <uri> ]  I find muddies what [] means.
7) I find it hard to read.

Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 14:05:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:41:06 UTC