- From: Tony Hammond <tony.hammond@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:11:15 +0100
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
I'm curious what can be said in RDF terms re comparing two URIs. For example, if I have two graphs G1: { ns:s ns:p ns:o } G2: { ns:s ns:p ns:o } then what can be said about reconciling the two subjects? Under what conditions is <ns:s> from G1 identical to <ns:s> from G2, i.e. referring to the same resource. (I'm assuming full URI normalization here, i.e. that the two RDF URI references compare equal, character by character, as Unicode strings.) So, for example. are there any differences wrt namespace value, e.g. a) @prefix ns: <http://my.example.org/path#> . b) @prefix ns: <data:,> . >From an RDF pov does it matter that a) has a DNS authority and b) does not? Or does RDF respect the opaque URI view. (Of course, both URIs may have representations but that doesn't tell us much about the resource they reference. The HTTP URI may or may not have a representation. The DATA URI has an inline representation.) And then between these two extremes (DNS authority and no authority) there are those URIs that have a central registry authority. Glad to get any insights on this question. Cheers, Tony
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2007 15:15:25 UTC