- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:45:23 +0000
- To: Frederick Giasson <fred@fgiasson.com>
- Cc: Chris Bizer <chris@bizer.de>, Semantic Web Interest Group <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 29 Nov 2007, at 15:49, Frederick Giasson wrote: > Hi Steve, > > > Good initiative! Thanks. > However a couple of things: > > > First I would suggest that you validate the syntax of "http://qdos.com/schema# > " using: "http://www.rdfabout.com/demo/validator/" Yes, it complains about q:spaces.live, but I think that's because that turtle parser is out of date. It passes raptor's syntax test. >> The links to eg. wikipedia use the property <http://qdos.com/schema#wikipedia >> >, is there something we can usefully make those properties a >> subPropertyOf? I would have liked to use the FOAF site membership >> properties, but they're unhelpful for the particular data we're >> trying to handle. >> > Not sure it is a good idea to make it a sub property of anything > considering how you described the q:wikipedia property. > > > Also, I would suggest that you use rdfs:domain and rdfs:range to > restrict the use of these properties. Otherwise, with the current > state of the ontology; I can use any of these properties to relate > any resource with any resource :) Yeah, sure, the schema is a bit crude, it's the bare minimum needed to make the site go. > so, currently I can say: <foaf:Person> <q:ebay> <foaf:Person> > > This has no meaning with the current definition. Is there are > documentation about the creation of this ontology? No, there wasn't time to document it unfortunately. > Would like to know what are modules, why you described all these > properties to the rdf:Property properties, etc. The properties of a property are just for compactness. We could have reified everything, but it would have bloated all the data. q:modules are an internal thing that tell us what piece of code to use to extract data from each type of resource. - Steve
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 16:46:01 UTC