- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:42:42 -0700
- To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, semantic-web@w3.org, www-international@w3.org
John Cowan wrote: > Sandro Hawke scripsit: > >> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" >> xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" >> xml:base="http://www.w3.org/International/articles/idn-and-iri/JP????/????????????"> >> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/"> >> <foaf:likes rdf:resource="" /> >> </rdf:Description> >> </rdf:RDF> >> ================================================================ > > Unfortunately, the above showed up in my mailer with a pile of question > marks, but I'll pretend it didn't. I'm also reversing the order of your > options for rhetorical purposes. me too, but I can see it in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2007Apr/0144.html just fine ... >> It parses to this N-Triple: >> >> <http://www.w3.org/> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/likes> <http://www.w3.org/International/articles/idn-and-iri/JP????/????????????>. > > Almost. It parses to the N-Triple that results when > you %-escape the above non-ASCII characters. If you > read either http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/ntriples/ > or http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#ntriples , you > will find that non-ASCII characters are not permitted > in N-Triples files. Furthermore, they are not required, > because N-Triples express relations between resources > named by URIs, not by IRIs. No, they are RDF URI References which can have non-ASCII characters encoded as \uHHHH (when in U+0000-U+FFFF range - not all of these are allowed in some situations such as writing them in XML 1.0) or \UHHHHHHHH (U+10000-U+10FFFF range). The N-Triples spec explains how to encode every codepoint U+0-U+10FFFF inclusive at: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#ntrip_strings There is an example in the example linked from the N-Triples spec: http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/ntriples/test.nt > I repeat: the value of an xml:base attribute may contain > non-ASCII (and non-URI) characters. The resulting base URI > does not; it contains their %-escaped equivalents. > >> I'm happy with this option, and I understood Jeremy and Chris to be as >> well. FWIW, the W3C RDF validator (using Jeremy's parser) does this. > > If the validator returns that N-Triple then it is broken. Yes, if it does, it is broken. The correct answer is: <http://www.w3.org/> <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/likes> <http://www.w3.org/International/articles/idn-and-iri/JP\u7D0D\u8C46/\u5F15\u304D\u5272\u308A\u7D0D\uFFFD\uFFFD> . My copy of ARP (behind the w3c validator) as well as my own Raptor parser, generate this with the example above. Dave
Received on Friday, 20 April 2007 01:46:47 UTC