Re: Towards a TAG consideration of CURIEs

Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote:
>> From: mark.birbeck@gmail.com [mailto:mark.birbeck@gmail.com] 
>> . . . 
>> code:12345 is not a valid QName. That's the whole point for proposing
>> an alternative to QNames. (In other words, the problem is not URI
>> construction per se, but encoding those URIs using QNames.)
>>     
>
> Oh, you're right, ":" is disallowed in a QName.  
Does xml:id take a QName?  I thought it took items of type ID.

-- 
Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com