- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:45:49 -0500
- To: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
- CC: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, www-tag@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, public-xg-mmsem@w3.org, newsml-g2@yahoogroups.com
Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: >> From: mark.birbeck@gmail.com [mailto:mark.birbeck@gmail.com] >> . . . >> code:12345 is not a valid QName. That's the whole point for proposing >> an alternative to QNames. (In other words, the problem is not URI >> construction per se, but encoding those URIs using QNames.) >> > > Oh, you're right, ":" is disallowed in a QName. Does xml:id take a QName? I thought it took items of type ID. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 13 April 2007 15:46:24 UTC