- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:36:46 -0400
- To: <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Cc: "Misha Wolf" <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, <www-tag@w3.org>, <semantic-web@w3.org>, <public-xg-mmsem@w3.org>, <newsml-g2@yahoogroups.com>
> From: mark.birbeck@gmail.com [mailto:mark.birbeck@gmail.com]
> . . .
> code:12345 is not a valid QName. That's the whole point for proposing
> an alternative to QNames. (In other words, the problem is not URI
> construction per se, but encoding those URIs using QNames.)
Oh, you're right, ":" is disallowed in a QName. So the prefix would
have to be something like "code." instead:
< . . . xml:id="code.12345" . . . >
< . . . xml:id="code.foo" . . . >
Admittedly this is not *quite* as pretty as "code:", but I think it's
still pretty clear to a human reader. Might this be good enough?
David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com
http://www.hp.com/go/software
Received on Friday, 13 April 2007 15:37:23 UTC