Re: Is RDFa ready to use with GRDDL?

In order to get wide adoption, the GRDDL WG has currently resolved that
GRDDL *should* (at least!) support XSLT 1.0 and *may* use other
languages. In particular, we were thinking about XQuery and XSLT 2.0,
and I'll try to make sure we incorporate some of the advantages of
XQuery/XSLT 2.0 in our docs somewhere to encourage adoption of those

Dan Brickley wrote:
> One brief point which I didn't see covered. My understanding is that
> RDFa is much more suited to XSLT 2.0 than to XSLT 1.0, due to the use of
> namespaces within XML attribute values. Actually I'm not sure if an XSLT
> 1.0 is "possible but verbose and a bit of a hack", or whether it has
> more serious limitations. Presumably the GRDDL WG will be giving some
> attention to version issues, use of even XQuery as a transform language,
> etc?
> Dan


Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 6B522426

Received on Monday, 4 September 2006 21:00:05 UTC