- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2006 21:58:39 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Yoshio Fukushige <fukushige.yoshio@jp.panasonic.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
In order to get wide adoption, the GRDDL WG has currently resolved that GRDDL *should* (at least!) support XSLT 1.0 and *may* use other languages. In particular, we were thinking about XQuery and XSLT 2.0, and I'll try to make sure we incorporate some of the advantages of XQuery/XSLT 2.0 in our docs somewhere to encourage adoption of those technologies. Dan Brickley wrote: > One brief point which I didn't see covered. My understanding is that > RDFa is much more suited to XSLT 2.0 than to XSLT 1.0, due to the use of > namespaces within XML attribute values. Actually I'm not sure if an XSLT > 1.0 is "possible but verbose and a bit of a hack", or whether it has > more serious limitations. Presumably the GRDDL WG will be giving some > attention to version issues, use of even XQuery as a transform language, > etc? > > Dan > > -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Monday, 4 September 2006 21:00:05 UTC