One brief point which I didn't see covered. My understanding is that RDFa is much more suited to XSLT 2.0 than to XSLT 1.0, due to the use of namespaces within XML attribute values. Actually I'm not sure if an XSLT 1.0 is "possible but verbose and a bit of a hack", or whether it has more serious limitations. Presumably the GRDDL WG will be giving some attention to version issues, use of even XQuery as a transform language, etc? DanReceived on Monday, 4 September 2006 20:16:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:44:58 UTC