- From: <tim.glover@bt.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:03:37 +0100
- To: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: <semantic-web@w3.org>
Well I don't object to URIs being used to uniquely identify web resources. But I do object to insisting that URIs are used for EVERYTHING, including words in a (programming) language. What is gained by it? And what is lost? myuri:One myuri:might myuri:as myuri:well myuri:insist myuri:that myuri:ordinary myuri:text myuri:uses myuri:URIs myuri:for myuri:every myuri:word myurl:in myuri:English Tim. -----Original Message----- From: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry Story Sent: 31 March 2006 15:24 To: Jon Hanna Cc: semantic-web@w3.org Subject: Re: Semantic Web Languages On 31 Mar 2006, at 15:12, Jon Hanna wrote: > tim.glover@bt.com wrote: > > More generally, the obsession with >> using XML and URIs for everything, > > I fail to see why using Uniform Resource Identifiers to identify > resources uniformly would count as an obsession. Sounds more like > "does what it says on the tin" to me. +1000 for that and what Danny said in the previous post. Henry
Received on Friday, 31 March 2006 15:03:50 UTC