- From: Cláudio Fernandes <cff@di.uevora.pt>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:52:11 +0000
- To: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Cc: Cláudio Fernandes <cff@di.uevora.pt>
Hi all, I've recently bumped with some (naive?) questions about SPARQL and the OWL language: We know that SPARQL is a query language for RDF [1], and that the owl language [2] is a vocabulary extension of RDF. Put it that way, is SPARQL "big" enough to query correctly an ontology described by the owl language? If it isn't, what is the "main" query language to do that, if any exist? OWL-QL? The bottom line is: if i want to build a semantic web agent, capable of querying an ontology, should i bet in rdf + SPARQL? or owl + ?? Will i be betting in the wrong horse if i go through the owl language only and discard the potentialities of SPARQL? Or I'm i really confused and the truth is in rdf/owl + SPARQL? And which are my limits in this case? thanks in advance for your time/thoughts, [1] - http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-rdf-sparql-query-20060220/ [2] - http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/ -- Cláudio Fernandes, Computer Science at Évora University, Portugal
Received on Saturday, 18 March 2006 13:39:45 UTC