Re: Soliciting input for "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies"

Guus, hello.

On 2006 Dec 4 , at 13.48, Guus Schreiber wrote:

> The Semantic Web Deployment Working Group [1, 2] is, amongst other  
> things, chartered to produce a revised and extended version of the  
> "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies"
[...]
> We would welcome input from the community on this, both through  
> comments on the first draft (especially if you've tried to use the  
> recipes) [4] and through people willing to join the SWD group for  
> working on this.

Well, I've used one of the recipes, and it seemed to work perfectly  
successfully.

It seemed to work so successfully that I worry that I'm missing  
something.  Modulo a couple of @@TODO comments, it's not obvious to  
me that there's much need for the document to be `revised and  
extended'.  One of the advantages of that document is its simplicity  
and straightforwardness -- you wouldn't want to compromise that.

Is there an issues list outstanding?

All the best (and thanks for the document),

Norman


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----
Norman Gray  /  http://nxg.me.uk
eurovotech.org  /  University of Leicester, UK

Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 14:46:05 UTC