- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:50:10 -0400
- To: Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org
I appreciate that your request was for publicly-available instance data, but as a possibly-minor footnote to this thread (especially given its title), I'd note (again) that the *publicly-available* instance data doesn't necessarily include all *real world* instance data. You mention copyright issues as one possible reason why this might be, but there are other reasons why such data might not be made generally-available (and, of course, such a decision makes it hard to ferret out the data). An example is data defined according to the electric utility Common Information Model (see, e.g., Section 6.5 of the RDF Primer). The Common Information Model is an IEC standard used for the integration of systems within the electric utility industry worldwide (the RDF Schema for this model is defined in IEC 61970-501). There is certainly lots of instance data conforming to this model (e.g., describing every piece of equipment in an electrical substation), but utilities tend to restrict use of that data to interchange between applications (and other utilities), and I can see why a utility might not want to make this available on the (public) Web. I don't know how many other applications might be like this (as I mentioned above, because they're not all that public, they're hard to ferret out), but the issue of non-public data is worth considering in the context of assessing the importance of the Semantic Web. Certainly as the use of Semantic Web technology increases in "real" applications, you're going to see it increasingly used for applications where the data, for one reason or another, has to be access-controlled in one way or another, and thus it won't be openly available. For example, if the Semantic Web were used for electronic patient records, that data wouldn't be openly available either, but that would be an important use of the Semantic Web (IMHO). --Frank Sören Auer wrote: > > Dear All, > > As an argument to stress the importance of the Semantic Web and as > example data to evaluate tools it would be nice to have a library of > real world RDF-S/OWL instance data available. My impression is, that > there are many schemas around, but it's harder to find real life > instance data. This might be due to copyright issues or the fact, that > the borderline between classes/schema and instances/data is not always > clearly marked and some projects rather use a representation as classes > than a representation as instance data. > > So, if you know of RDF-S/OWL instance data which is publicly available > and shows an interesting application please let us know. I'm especially, > interested in the impact of its usage. ;-) > > The following is interesting Semantic Web data I know of: > > * Wordnet - a lexical database for the English language [1] > * UNSPSC (Universal Standard Products and Services Classification) > representation as classes [2] > * Wikipedia in RDF [3] > * Open Directory DMOZ in RDF [4] > * Open Bio-Medical Ontologies in OWL (rep. as classes) [5] > * FOAF - Friend of a Friend (many small instances available on the Web) [6] > > I will summarize all statements and post it to the list again and maybe > create some wikipage for persistent reference. > > --Sören > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion.html > [2] http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mcaklein/unspsc/ > [3] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/RDF > [4] http://rdf.dmoz.org/ > [5] http://www.fruitfly.org/~cjm/obo-download/ > [6] http://www.foaf-project.org/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2006 16:43:08 UTC