- From: Bob DuCharme <bob@snee.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:14:31 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Frank Manola" <fmanola@acm.org>
- Cc: Sören Auer <auer@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, semantic-web@w3.org
On Wed, August 2, 2006 12:50 pm, Frank Manola wrote: > > I appreciate that your request was for publicly-available instance data, > but as a possibly-minor footnote to this thread (especially given its > title), I'd note (again) that the *publicly-available* instance data > doesn't necessarily include all *real world* instance data. Frank, I find it perfectly plausible that there is more RDF behind firewalls than publicly available (although of course we can't be sure), but I was curious: do you have any ideas about why this is so? Could it be because a system limited to use within one enterprise makes it easier to impose more top-down control over the use of a particular ontology, and that this greater control gives people more incentive to follow through on a project involving the creation and use of large amounts of RDF data? thanks, Bob
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2006 14:14:58 UTC