- From: Avril Styrman <Avril.Styrman@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 13:06:59 +0300
- To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>, "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@volcano.net>
- Cc: David Pratt <fairwinds@eastlink.ca>, semantic-web@w3.org
A couple of years ago Protege allowed to save e.g. '<:;>' within RDFS:COMMENT, but wasn't able to open the schema again after closing. I wonder whether or not this is possible with the latest version. A.Styrman Quoting "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@volcano.net>: > > I should have told you what kind of errors MKE might miss. > MKE does not check URI validity. > If you use "#" when you shouldn't, or vice versa, MKE won't notice. > > Dick McCullough > knowledge := man do identify od existent done; > knowledge haspart proposition list; > http://rhm.cdepot.net/ > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@volcano.net> > To: "David Pratt" <fairwinds@eastlink.ca>; <semantic-web@w3.org> > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:57 AM > Subject: Re: RDF Schema Creation Questions > > > > I'll "validate" it for you. > > MKE does lots of diagnostics, and pretty prints your hierarchies. > > > > One caveat: MKE is checking semantics, not syntax. > > Your ontology might pass MKE semantic check and fail RDF syntax check. > > But it should give you a lot more confidence in your ontology. > > > > Dick McCullough > > knowledge := man do identify od existent done; > > knowledge haspart proposition list; > > http://rhm.cdepot.net/ > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Pratt" <fairwinds@eastlink.ca> > > To: <semantic-web@w3.org> > > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:13 AM > > Subject: RDF Schema Creation Questions > > > > > >> > >> Hi. I am writing an RDF schema but I have couple of questions. First, > > >> it validates on W3C's RDF validator but seems to die when loading as a > > >> new project in Protege so it has me concerned that there may be a > >> problem that I am not aware with my schema or that Protege may be > >> giving me grief. I am not sure which. Can someone suggest an > >> alternative tool I could consider using that can read and validate my > > >> index.rdf as a schema. > >> > >> Protege puts all the classes and properties in alphabetical order also > > >> where I want to put things in a different order so it will go with the > > >> order the data will be entered for the most part. So I wrote a script > > >> in python to assemble the schema in the order I wanted after I > >> understood the rdf structure a bit more. > >> > >> My goal is for the schema to be used by normal rdf libraries (such as > > >> rdflib in python) so I have used owl sparingly. I am using FOAF as a > > >> guide a bit this way since it is a well used schema. > >> > >> Are there any ontology gurus out there that is willing to have a quick > > >> look at my schema to determine whether it has any obvious flaws can be > > >> identified? I am prepared to put it up on the web so it can be viewed. > > >> This would be very much appreciated as this is my first attempt and > any > >> comments or suggestions that could help make it better would be > welcome. > >> > >> Many thanks, > >> David > >> > >> > >
Received on Friday, 7 October 2005 11:19:26 UTC