Re: Protege

I am not a current Protege user, and have not tried to keep abreast of the 
status of Protege.
You should post your question to the Protege email list.

Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://rhm.cdepot.net/
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Avril Styrman" <Avril.Styrman@helsinki.fi>
To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>; "Richard H. McCullough" 
<rhm@volcano.net>
Cc: "David Pratt" <fairwinds@eastlink.ca>; <semantic-web@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: RDF Schema Creation Questions


>A couple of years ago Protege allowed to save e.g. '<:;>' within
> RDFS:COMMENT, but wasn't able to open the schema again after closing. I
> wonder whether or not this is possible with the latest version.
>
> A.Styrman
>
> Quoting "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@volcano.net>:
>
>>
>> I should have told you what kind of errors MKE might miss.
>> MKE does not check URI validity.
>> If you use "#" when you shouldn't, or vice versa, MKE won't notice.
>>
>> Dick McCullough
>> knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
>> knowledge haspart proposition list;
>> http://rhm.cdepot.net/
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@volcano.net>
>> To: "David Pratt" <fairwinds@eastlink.ca>; <semantic-web@w3.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:57 AM
>> Subject: Re: RDF Schema Creation Questions
>>
>>
>> > I'll "validate" it for you.
>> > MKE does lots of diagnostics, and pretty prints your hierarchies.
>> >
>> > One caveat: MKE is checking semantics, not syntax.
>> > Your ontology might pass MKE semantic check and fail RDF syntax check.
>> > But it should give you a lot more confidence in your ontology.
>> >
>> > Dick McCullough
>> > knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
>> > knowledge haspart proposition list;
>> > http://rhm.cdepot.net/
>> > ----- Original Message ----- 
>> > From: "David Pratt" <fairwinds@eastlink.ca>
>> > To: <semantic-web@w3.org>
>> > Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:13 AM
>> > Subject: RDF Schema Creation Questions
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Hi.  I am writing an RDF schema but I have couple of questions. First,
>>
>> >> it validates on W3C's RDF validator but seems to die when loading as a
>>
>> >> new project in Protégé so it has me concerned that there may be a
>> >> problem that I am not aware with my schema or that Protégé may be
>> >> giving me grief. I am not sure which.  Can someone suggest an
>> >> alternative tool I could consider using that can read and validate my
>>
>> >> index.rdf as a schema.
>> >>
>> >> Protégé puts all the classes and properties in alphabetical order also
>>
>> >> where I want to put things in a different order so it will go with the
>>
>> >> order the data will be entered for the most part. So I wrote a script
>>
>> >> in python to assemble the schema in the order I wanted after I
>> >> understood the rdf structure a bit more.
>> >>
>> >> My goal is for the schema to be used by normal rdf libraries (such as
>>
>> >> rdflib in python) so I have used owl sparingly.  I am using FOAF as a
>>
>> >> guide a bit this way since it is a well used schema.
>> >>
>> >> Are there any ontology gurus out there that is willing to have a quick
>>
>> >> look at my schema to determine whether it has any obvious flaws can be
>>
>> >> identified? I am prepared to put it up on the web so it can be viewed.
>>
>> >> This would be very much appreciated as this is my first attempt and
>> any
>> >> comments or suggestions that could help make it better would be
>> welcome.
>> >>
>> >> Many thanks,
>> >> David
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>

Received on Friday, 7 October 2005 10:31:44 UTC