- From: Joshua Tauberer <tauberer@for.net>
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:27:58 -0400
- To: "Hammond, Tony" <T.Hammond@nature.com>
- CC: "'SWIG'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hammond, Tony wrote: > It's called 'info:' > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vandesompel-info-uri-04.txt Ah, that's pretty good. My reservation is its own custom registration process, in which everyone that wants to use info: would need to register. With http: URIs, there really is no registration process because it works off of the structure of authority in http: URLs (which isn't just domain names, but the authority of subdirectories too). It would be nice to have a URI scheme like info: but without the need for another registration. So if you have the authority over http:X, you have the authority over newscheme:X. One way to merge that with info would be to say if you own a domain name, you're automatically registered with that name in the info: registry. Also, this is totally irrelevant, but I can't help but point out something a bit ridiculous (light sarcasm): > DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is > not the original intended recipient. Who was the unique intended recipient of your email? Was everyone else on the mail list supposed to shred their copy of the email? :) -- - Joshua Tauberer http://taubz.for.net ** Nothing Unreal Exists **
Received on Wednesday, 5 October 2005 14:28:26 UTC