RE: New Intro to RDF

> Hammond, Tony wrote:
> > One thing you may want to change, though, throughout is your use of
> > 'urn:' URIs. The '/' character is specifically reserved in 'urn:' 
> > syntax
> 
> Okay, good point.  My goal was to point out that URIs aren't 
> necessarily confusable with web stuff, but I guess I ended up 
> with something that was a valid URI on the face of it but an 
> invalid URN.  What would be nice is a URI scheme that has the 
> same hierarchical syntax as http, but without bearing any 
> similarity to a web-oriented URL.  Maybe an 'id' scheme to 
> make hierarchical identifiers.
> 

It's called 'info:'

	
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-vandesompel-info-uri-04.txt

;)

********************************************************************************   
DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is confidential and should not be used by anyone who is
not the original intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail in error
please inform the sender and delete it from your mailbox or any other storage
mechanism. Neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents accept
liability for any statements made which are clearly the sender's own and not
expressly made on behalf of Macmillan Publishers Limited or one of its agents.
Please note that neither Macmillan Publishers Limited nor any of its agents
accept any responsibility for viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or
its attachments and it is your responsibility to scan the e-mail and 
attachments (if any). No contracts may be concluded on behalf of Macmillan 
Publishers Limited or its agents by means of e-mail communication. Macmillan 
Publishers Limited Registered in England and Wales with registered number 785998 
Registered Office Brunel Road, Houndmills, Basingstoke RG21 6XS   
********************************************************************************

Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2005 13:03:20 UTC