- From: ben syverson <w3@likn.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:11:13 -0600
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
On Mar 13, 2005, at 5:16 AM, Danny Ayers wrote: > If it's just the relationship between the words you're after, Morten > has a vocab for dealing with the label aspect: > http://www.wasab.dk/morten/2004/03/label > > I got the link from Schemaweb: > http://www.schemaweb.info/ Cool -- thanks! > I would imagine that if you wanted to go deeper into the modelling it > could get tricky fast. Don't know, but I expect there are quite a few > papers around on the general subject. I wonder if you could say the > class People subclass of Person but with property members > cardinality>1..? I'm not sure... It won't make any difference to qbot, likn's chatbot, because it's not a real RDF inference engine -- it just looks for a hard-coded "singular/plural" relationship, and is hard-coded to know what to do. I guess what's at issue is how the community would want to see this expressed in code likn outputs. More useful as a refinement of "label," or as a more explicit relationship? - ben
Received on Monday, 14 March 2005 05:11:16 UTC