- From: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto@gmuer.ch>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 08:08:41 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Hello I use vocabulary term containing a fragment identifier, however I'm unsure if the name of ontology itself should contain a pound sign (like rdfs and rdf) or not (like owl). According to the doc at http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl rdf:type owl:Ontology According to the doc at http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# rdf:type owl:Ontology Maybe the question is whether an ontology in an information resource or the just the topic of an information resource. reto
Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 06:08:48 UTC