- From: Oscar Celma <ocelma@iua.upf.es>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 11:56:55 +0200
- To: danny.ayers@gmail.com
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org, rss-dev@yahoogroups.com, rss-media@yahoogroups.com, <ipodder-dev@yahoogroups.com>
Hi, Roberto Garcia proposed, in [1], a version of (the whole) MPEG-7 in OWL. The problem is that is not a "fairly simple vocabularies/languages/formats"... Cheers, Oscar. [1] http://dmag.upf.edu/ontologies/mpeg7ontos/ On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:28:01 +0200 Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni@wup.it> wrote: > > Danny Ayers wrote: > > >Anyone happen to know of any existing, fairly simple > >vocabularies/languages/formats for annotating media data? Something > >that might be expressable like: > > > ><media rdf:about="http://example.org/wedding-speech.mp3"> > > <segments> > > <segment> > > <start>00:00</start> > > <end>12:00</end> > > <description>The groom's early deliquencies</description> > > <transcript>Unaccustomed as I am... > >... > > > >Cheers, > >Danny. > > > > > > > > > Mpeg-7 in xml is really heavyweight and i wouldnt know how to make it > work with rdf directly. The lightweight (experimental?) owl version > seems more like it http://metadata.net/harmony/MPEG7/MPEG7.rdfs ops > its rdfs, but there might be an owl version somewhere. I am unsure why > this file isnt liked from the harmony project itself. > > Giovanni
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2005 10:48:30 UTC