- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:28:08 +0200
- To: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch>
- Cc: James Cerra <jfcst24_public@yahoo.com>, semantic-web@w3.org
Does this not get even a little more complicated with the introduction of IRIs? Don't know much about IRIs other than that Atom is using them currently. Henry On 6 Jun 2005, at 14:26, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote: > > Jimmy, > > >> Note that <http://gmuer.ch/aü> is not a valid URI can can never >> be a resource >> name. The string <http://gmuer.ch/a%C3%BC> is a valid URI and so >> can be a >> resource name. >> > Why is the first an invalid Resource name? I agree that it is not a > valid URI, but as I understand rdf-concepts resources are > identified by > URIRefs and http://gmuer.ch/aü is a valid URIRef. Both URIRefs resolve > to the same URI but they identify two distinct resources. > > reto > >
Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 13:28:17 UTC