Re: Identity of URIRefs / Resources from Reto Bachmann-Gmuer on 2005-06-06 (semantic-web@w3.org from June 2005)

From: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:26:17 +0200
To: James Cerra <jfcst24_public@yahoo.com>
Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Message-Id: <1118060777.19221.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Jimmy,

> Note that <http://gmuer.ch/aÃ��> is not a valid URI can can never be a resource
> name.  The string <http://gmuer.ch/a%C3%BC> is a valid URI and so can be a
> resource name.  
Why is the first an invalid Resource name? I agree that it is not a
valid URI, but as I understand rdf-concepts resources are identified by
URIRefs and http://gmuer.ch/a�� is a valid URIRef. Both URIRefs resolve
to the same URI but they identify two distinct resources.

reto

Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 12:26:19 UTC