RE: Developers Guide to Semantic Web Toolkits for different Programming Languages from Joshua Allen on 2005-02-08 (semantic-web@w3.org from February 2005)

From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:55:45 -0800
To: "Richard Newman" <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>, <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Message-ID: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E5204352F00@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

> The counter-argument is that "Lisp" is a common shorthand for "Common
> Lisp", but it's not something that strikes me as correct in the
context
> of a document intended for public reference, particularly when there

Yeah, I have written a lot of "Lisp" code in my life, and would quickly
flip the bozo bit on anyone nitpicky enough to say, 'technically it is
not called Lisp'.  But for public reference docs, correctness is very
important.

Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 18:56:10 UTC