W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Developers Guide to Semantic Web Toolkits for different Programming Languages

From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:55:45 -0800
Message-ID: <0E36FD96D96FCA4AA8E8F2D199320E5204352F00@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Richard Newman" <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>, <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

> The counter-argument is that "Lisp" is a common shorthand for "Common
> Lisp", but it's not something that strikes me as correct in the
context
> of a document intended for public reference, particularly when there

Yeah, I have written a lot of "Lisp" code in my life, and would quickly
flip the bozo bit on anyone nitpicky enough to say, 'technically it is
not called Lisp'.  But for public reference docs, correctness is very
important.
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 18:56:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:44 UTC