W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > February 2005

Re: Developers Guide to Semantic Web Toolkits for different Programming Languages

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:11:02 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20050208.141102.121780114.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: joshuaa@microsoft.com
Cc: r.newman@reading.ac.uk, semantic-web@w3.org

Agreed, it is rather sloppy to not say which dialect is meant, but, again,
how is this different from K&R C/ANSI C; various C++ dialects (and
libraries); various Java libraries, not to mention Sun vs Microsoft; and
various ML dialects?

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: Developers Guide to Semantic Web Toolkits for different Programming Languages
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:55:45 -0800

> > The counter-argument is that "Lisp" is a common shorthand for "Common
> > Lisp", but it's not something that strikes me as correct in the
> context
> > of a document intended for public reference, particularly when there
> 
> Yeah, I have written a lot of "Lisp" code in my life, and would quickly
> flip the bozo bit on anyone nitpicky enough to say, 'technically it is
> not called Lisp'.  But for public reference docs, correctness is very
> important.
> 
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 19:11:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 07:41:44 UTC