- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 14:11:02 -0500 (EST)
- To: joshuaa@microsoft.com
- Cc: r.newman@reading.ac.uk, semantic-web@w3.org
Agreed, it is rather sloppy to not say which dialect is meant, but, again, how is this different from K&R C/ANSI C; various C++ dialects (and libraries); various Java libraries, not to mention Sun vs Microsoft; and various ML dialects? Peter F. Patel-Schneider From: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com> Subject: RE: Developers Guide to Semantic Web Toolkits for different Programming Languages Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 10:55:45 -0800 > > The counter-argument is that "Lisp" is a common shorthand for "Common > > Lisp", but it's not something that strikes me as correct in the > context > > of a document intended for public reference, particularly when there > > Yeah, I have written a lot of "Lisp" code in my life, and would quickly > flip the bozo bit on anyone nitpicky enough to say, 'technically it is > not called Lisp'. But for public reference docs, correctness is very > important. >
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 19:11:14 UTC