- From: Christian Grün <cg@basex.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 09:22:06 +0100
- To: Benito van der Zander <benito@benibela.de>
- Cc: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, public-xslt-40@w3.org
Received on Saturday, 19 December 2020 08:22:29 UTC
I think that ≠ should better be used as alias for !=, not „ne”; otherwise, the representations can easily be mixed up (in particular, if you use a font with ligatures). Same for eq, le, ge, lt, gt. Benito van der Zander <benito@benibela.de> schrieb am Sa., 19. Dez. 2020, 00:36: > > I also added a proposal for non-ASCII mathematical operators as optional > alternatives to keywords like div and gt. (I fear this could become a bit > of a bicycle shed, though...) > > Well, that is .. interesting. Might help XPath to stand out from > ordinary programming languages > > I would never have thought about using ∃ or ∀ > > Then there could also be ∈ for "in" > > > > >
Received on Saturday, 19 December 2020 08:22:29 UTC