- From: Christian Grün <cg@basex.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 19:23:38 +0100
- To: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com>
- Cc: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, public-xslt-40@w3.org
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 5:51 PM Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would rather prefer this to be a system-provided record type. Name it range > > record(start? xs:integer, end? xs:integer, step? xs:integer) As the existing range expression is simple to understand and popular, I’m not sure if we should really do something completely new. One could argue that there might be no need for a range modifier at all, as it’s already simple to modify range values: (1 to 10)[. mod 2 = 1], (1 to 5) ! (. * 2), … On the other hand, the proposed extension is basic enough to… …sorry, yes, the bikeshed.
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2020 18:24:04 UTC