- From: Mukul Gandhi <gandhi.mukul@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 06:06:22 +0530
- To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
- Cc: gerrit.imsieke@le-tex.de, public-xslt-40@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2020 00:36:51 UTC
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:30 PM Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> wrote: > I'm going to stick with "by" for the time being. > IMHO, "step" looks better to me than "by", for naming of this operator. Though, I've some agreement with following, which Liam wrote earlier within this thread, 'we should probably avoid anything that implies procedural looping'. (since XSLT has a tradition, to be much more functional than procedural language) -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Received on Tuesday, 1 December 2020 00:36:51 UTC